I agree, I think modal dialogs and inline conversations would be really good, but I think it would make sense to get the new UI into trunk so we can work on stabilizing it and working out bugs. Then work on modal dialogs and inline conversations in separate branches until they are stable, then merge them into trunk.
Ethan On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't quite get the first example? > You want to display the conversations in a popup window? > The inline function for conversations is also jquery so why not implement > that? > > I agree we should definitely use JQuery more, but still think we should focus > on finishing the (static) UI first and then take it from there. > Or we could of course work in parallel? I finish one (static) page and > you/someone else continues with the jquery? > > - anne > > > On 12. mars 2010, at 05.08, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> I've got a few ideas for the UI. I'd like to use JQuery functionality more: >> >> For example: >> >> - For conversations, inline would be better but before we get implement >> that - what about this: >> http://example.nemikor.com/loading-a-page-into-a-dialog/ . >> - For our dialogs (sign, creating actions, creating tracks, creating >> tokens, selecting streams, etc.), what about using the modal form dialog ( >> http://jqueryui.com/demos/dialog/#modal-form). This would lead to cleaner >> UI without tabs >> - Use modal dialog for user settings. >> >> D. > >
