I will do some work tomorrow and focus on making IE7 work. - anne
On 13. mars 2010, at 11.20, Richard Hirsch wrote: > @anne I'm probably going to check everything in on Monday. If you > concentrate on CSS changes (IE7, etc) and work from the branch, we > shouldn't have any problems / conflicts > > D- > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>wrote: > >> If you can wait until tomorrow, I'll check in my changes in the branch. >> I'll try and merge the branch back into the trunk as well if I have time. If >> I have trouble during the merge, I'd suggest that you use the branch. >> >> Just watch the esme-commits list to see how far I am. >> >> BTW - added pretty date formatting for message stream today during my train >> ride - "2 minutes ago, 2 days ago", etc. >> >> D. >> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> If I want to do some UI work this weekend can I use the current trunk or >>> do you need to check in first? >>> >>> - Anne Kathrine >>> Sent from my iPhone, apologies for bad spelling >>> >>> >>> On 12. mars 2010, at 17.39, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I wanted to check-in the trunk today but I had to deal with an emergency >>>> at >>>> a customer site, I'll check-in either on Monday or or on the weekend. >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree, I think modal dialogs and inline conversations would be >>>>> really good, but I think it would make sense to get the new UI into >>>>> trunk so we can work on stabilizing it and working out bugs. Then work >>>>> on modal dialogs and inline conversations in separate branches until >>>>> they are stable, then merge them into trunk. >>>>> >>>>> Ethan >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I didn't quite get the first example? >>>>>> You want to display the conversations in a popup window? >>>>>> The inline function for conversations is also jquery so why not >>>>>> implement >>>>>> >>>>> that? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree we should definitely use JQuery more, but still think we should >>>>>> >>>>> focus on finishing the (static) UI first and then take it from there. >>>>> >>>>>> Or we could of course work in parallel? I finish one (static) page and >>>>>> >>>>> you/someone else continues with the jquery? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - anne >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12. mars 2010, at 05.08, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I've got a few ideas for the UI. I'd like to use JQuery functionality >>>>>>> >>>>>> more: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> For example: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - For conversations, inline would be better but before we get >>>>>>> >>>>>> implement >>>>> >>>>>> that - what about this: >>>>>>> http://example.nemikor.com/loading-a-page-into-a-dialog/ . >>>>>>> - For our dialogs (sign, creating actions, creating tracks, creating >>>>>>> tokens, selecting streams, etc.), what about using the modal form >>>>>>> >>>>>> dialog ( >>>>> >>>>>> http://jqueryui.com/demos/dialog/#modal-form). This would lead to >>>>>>> >>>>>> cleaner >>>>> >>>>>> UI without tabs >>>>>>> - Use modal dialog for user settings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> D. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>
