I wanted to check-in the trunk today but I had to deal with an emergency at a customer site, I'll check-in either on Monday or or on the weekend.
D. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree, I think modal dialogs and inline conversations would be > really good, but I think it would make sense to get the new UI into > trunk so we can work on stabilizing it and working out bugs. Then work > on modal dialogs and inline conversations in separate branches until > they are stable, then merge them into trunk. > > Ethan > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I didn't quite get the first example? > > You want to display the conversations in a popup window? > > The inline function for conversations is also jquery so why not implement > that? > > > > I agree we should definitely use JQuery more, but still think we should > focus on finishing the (static) UI first and then take it from there. > > Or we could of course work in parallel? I finish one (static) page and > you/someone else continues with the jquery? > > > > - anne > > > > > > On 12. mars 2010, at 05.08, Richard Hirsch wrote: > > > >> I've got a few ideas for the UI. I'd like to use JQuery functionality > more: > >> > >> For example: > >> > >> - For conversations, inline would be better but before we get > implement > >> that - what about this: > >> http://example.nemikor.com/loading-a-page-into-a-dialog/ . > >> - For our dialogs (sign, creating actions, creating tracks, creating > >> tokens, selecting streams, etc.), what about using the modal form > dialog ( > >> http://jqueryui.com/demos/dialog/#modal-form). This would lead to > cleaner > >> UI without tabs > >> - Use modal dialog for user settings. > >> > >> D. > > > > >
