Have you tried it on perf stax instance? On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]>wrote:
> I wanted to test in IE7, but I cannot sign up for a new account on my > machine (localhost:8080). > Is the signup page broken or is it only me? > > /Anne > > > On 2. apr. 2010, at 08.27, Richard Hirsch wrote: > > > Thanks for the UI-related work. It is great that others are doing UI work > as > > well. > > > > Unfortunately, I'm on vacation and can't do a stax deployment until > Tuesday. > > :-< > > > > D. > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I just checked in word-wrap based fixes for both the timeline and the > >> popular messages/links. Word on the street is that this actually > >> should work in IE as well. Can someone build trunk and test, at least > >> on IE7? Any really long link with only normal characters in it (not -) > >> should trigger the issue. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ethan > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> OK, so we need to find a way to deal with text wrapping. > >>> We should probably decide which browsers to support in release 1.1 and > >> take it from there. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 28. mars 2010, at 19.22, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >>> > >>>> Yup, understood re. big companies still using IE6. I was just > >>>> wondering if any of our specific users (Siemens, at least) still > >>>> consider it supported internally. If not, then it might make sense to > >>>> consider not supporting it if it is a lot of extra work. > >>>> > >>>> On the messages front, it's just messages with long links, or other > >>>> long unbroken text strings that suffer the wrapping problem. > >>>> > >>>> Ethan > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Is the wrapping problem for messages for all messages or just those > >> containing long links? > >>>>> > >>>>> The problem is that many big companies still use IE6 and won't care > >> about end-of-life dates. > >>>>> @Dick: IE6 support is still important for Siemens right? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 28. mars 2010, at 16.28, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Sounds like a good approach to me, but keep in mind that we still > have > >>>>>> the wrapping problem for messages themselves. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What is the situation with IE6 support at places that have this > >>>>>> deployed currently? I'm thinking since IE6 and most IE7 versions > >>>>>> end-of-life is July 13th, those working on the UI might not want to > >>>>>> put too much effort into it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> I am just afraid that text wrapping is something which will take a > >> significant amount of time to get right. > >>>>>>> Remember we have support the following browsers: > >>>>>>> IE6 > >>>>>>> IE7 > >>>>>>> IE8 > >>>>>>> Safari > >>>>>>> Firefox > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think we should put it in the backlog for now and remove these > >> features from the UI for the 1.1 release. > >>>>>>> What say you? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 27. mars 2010, at 15.42, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Whoops! I just created ESME-186 and attached it there: > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-186 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Richard Hirsch < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Ethan Jewett < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Richard Hirsch < > >> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> What I'd like to do is use JQuery tool tips to display the > help. > >> I just > >>>>>>>>>>> finished converting the action page and just deleted the help. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> That sounds just about perfect! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Good luck. Do you have suggestion of how to display a long > url? > >> Maybe > >>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>> a mouse-over that displays the fulltext. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think for starters we could drop the # of clicks and get away > >> from a > >>>>>>>>>> table-based model to a list-based model in the html. That helps > >>>>>>>>>> compact things a bit and gives us more ability to use CSS for > >> managing > >>>>>>>>>> text display. The next step is to force wrapping, which to the > >> best of > >>>>>>>>>> my knowledge is not really possible in CSS2. Fortunately CSS3 > has > >> the > >>>>>>>>>> "word-wrap:break-word" style, which does exactly what we want. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I've attached a mock-up done using CSS3 using this approach. > What > >> do you > >>>>>>>>>> think? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Email it to me directly, since the esme-dev mailing deamon > usually > >> kills > >>>>>>>>> attachments. > >>>>>>>>> Or attach it to JIRA-100 item. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> As a last resort, if we can't find a way to extend this to > >> non-CSS3 > >>>>>>>>>> browsers, we could probably do some fancy JS or something to > >> insert > >>>>>>>>>> spaces into the text representation of the link, allowing it to > >> wrap. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> What about creating dialogs but not modal dialogs. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think modal dialogs and normal dialogs suffer from the same > >>>>>>>>>> disadvantages in this situation. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
