It works on the perf stax instance. Which revision is deployed there? On 3. apr. 2010, at 08.33, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> Have you tried it on perf stax instance? > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I wanted to test in IE7, but I cannot sign up for a new account on my >> machine (localhost:8080). >> Is the signup page broken or is it only me? >> >> /Anne >> >> >> On 2. apr. 2010, at 08.27, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the UI-related work. It is great that others are doing UI work >> as >>> well. >>> >>> Unfortunately, I'm on vacation and can't do a stax deployment until >> Tuesday. >>> :-< >>> >>> D. >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I just checked in word-wrap based fixes for both the timeline and the >>>> popular messages/links. Word on the street is that this actually >>>> should work in IE as well. Can someone build trunk and test, at least >>>> on IE7? Any really long link with only normal characters in it (not -) >>>> should trigger the issue. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ethan >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> OK, so we need to find a way to deal with text wrapping. >>>>> We should probably decide which browsers to support in release 1.1 and >>>> take it from there. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28. mars 2010, at 19.22, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yup, understood re. big companies still using IE6. I was just >>>>>> wondering if any of our specific users (Siemens, at least) still >>>>>> consider it supported internally. If not, then it might make sense to >>>>>> consider not supporting it if it is a lot of extra work. >>>>>> >>>>>> On the messages front, it's just messages with long links, or other >>>>>> long unbroken text strings that suffer the wrapping problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ethan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Is the wrapping problem for messages for all messages or just those >>>> containing long links? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The problem is that many big companies still use IE6 and won't care >>>> about end-of-life dates. >>>>>>> @Dick: IE6 support is still important for Siemens right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28. mars 2010, at 16.28, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sounds like a good approach to me, but keep in mind that we still >> have >>>>>>>> the wrapping problem for messages themselves. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What is the situation with IE6 support at places that have this >>>>>>>> deployed currently? I'm thinking since IE6 and most IE7 versions >>>>>>>> end-of-life is July 13th, those working on the UI might not want to >>>>>>>> put too much effort into it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ethan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> I am just afraid that text wrapping is something which will take a >>>> significant amount of time to get right. >>>>>>>>> Remember we have support the following browsers: >>>>>>>>> IE6 >>>>>>>>> IE7 >>>>>>>>> IE8 >>>>>>>>> Safari >>>>>>>>> Firefox >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think we should put it in the backlog for now and remove these >>>> features from the UI for the 1.1 release. >>>>>>>>> What say you? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 27. mars 2010, at 15.42, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Whoops! I just created ESME-186 and attached it there: >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-186 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ethan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Richard Hirsch < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Ethan Jewett < >> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Richard Hirsch < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What I'd like to do is use JQuery tool tips to display the >> help. >>>> I just >>>>>>>>>>>>> finished converting the action page and just deleted the help. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That sounds just about perfect! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck. Do you have suggestion of how to display a long >> url? >>>> Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>> a mouse-over that displays the fulltext. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think for starters we could drop the # of clicks and get away >>>> from a >>>>>>>>>>>> table-based model to a list-based model in the html. That helps >>>>>>>>>>>> compact things a bit and gives us more ability to use CSS for >>>> managing >>>>>>>>>>>> text display. The next step is to force wrapping, which to the >>>> best of >>>>>>>>>>>> my knowledge is not really possible in CSS2. Fortunately CSS3 >> has >>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> "word-wrap:break-word" style, which does exactly what we want. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've attached a mock-up done using CSS3 using this approach. >> What >>>> do you >>>>>>>>>>>> think? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Email it to me directly, since the esme-dev mailing deamon >> usually >>>> kills >>>>>>>>>>> attachments. >>>>>>>>>>> Or attach it to JIRA-100 item. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As a last resort, if we can't find a way to extend this to >>>> non-CSS3 >>>>>>>>>>>> browsers, we could probably do some fancy JS or something to >>>> insert >>>>>>>>>>>> spaces into the text representation of the link, allowing it to >>>> wrap. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What about creating dialogs but not modal dialogs. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think modal dialogs and normal dialogs suffer from the same >>>>>>>>>>>> disadvantages in this situation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ethan >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
