Until I can signup with IE7/8 I cannot test it unfortunately, but can confirm that it looks good on FF (Win)
On 3. apr. 2010, at 15.30, Richard Hirsch wrote: > The code drop from Monday. What sort of error do you get? Does it work on > FF? > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> It works on the perf stax instance. >> Which revision is deployed there? >> >> On 3. apr. 2010, at 08.33, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >>> Have you tried it on perf stax instance? >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe < >> [email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I wanted to test in IE7, but I cannot sign up for a new account on my >>>> machine (localhost:8080). >>>> Is the signup page broken or is it only me? >>>> >>>> /Anne >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2. apr. 2010, at 08.27, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for the UI-related work. It is great that others are doing UI >> work >>>> as >>>>> well. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, I'm on vacation and can't do a stax deployment until >>>> Tuesday. >>>>> :-< >>>>> >>>>> D. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I just checked in word-wrap based fixes for both the timeline and the >>>>>> popular messages/links. Word on the street is that this actually >>>>>> should work in IE as well. Can someone build trunk and test, at least >>>>>> on IE7? Any really long link with only normal characters in it (not -) >>>>>> should trigger the issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ethan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> OK, so we need to find a way to deal with text wrapping. >>>>>>> We should probably decide which browsers to support in release 1.1 >> and >>>>>> take it from there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28. mars 2010, at 19.22, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yup, understood re. big companies still using IE6. I was just >>>>>>>> wondering if any of our specific users (Siemens, at least) still >>>>>>>> consider it supported internally. If not, then it might make sense >> to >>>>>>>> consider not supporting it if it is a lot of extra work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On the messages front, it's just messages with long links, or other >>>>>>>> long unbroken text strings that suffer the wrapping problem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ethan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Is the wrapping problem for messages for all messages or just those >>>>>> containing long links? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The problem is that many big companies still use IE6 and won't care >>>>>> about end-of-life dates. >>>>>>>>> @Dick: IE6 support is still important for Siemens right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 28. mars 2010, at 16.28, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a good approach to me, but keep in mind that we still >>>> have >>>>>>>>>> the wrapping problem for messages themselves. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What is the situation with IE6 support at places that have this >>>>>>>>>> deployed currently? I'm thinking since IE6 and most IE7 versions >>>>>>>>>> end-of-life is July 13th, those working on the UI might not want >> to >>>>>>>>>> put too much effort into it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ethan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I am just afraid that text wrapping is something which will take >> a >>>>>> significant amount of time to get right. >>>>>>>>>>> Remember we have support the following browsers: >>>>>>>>>>> IE6 >>>>>>>>>>> IE7 >>>>>>>>>>> IE8 >>>>>>>>>>> Safari >>>>>>>>>>> Firefox >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should put it in the backlog for now and remove these >>>>>> features from the UI for the 1.1 release. >>>>>>>>>>> What say you? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 27. mars 2010, at 15.42, Ethan Jewett wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Whoops! I just created ESME-186 and attached it there: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-186 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ethan >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Richard Hirsch < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Ethan Jewett < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Richard Hirsch < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What I'd like to do is use JQuery tool tips to display the >>>> help. >>>>>> I just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finished converting the action page and just deleted the >> help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That sounds just about perfect! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck. Do you have suggestion of how to display a long >>>> url? >>>>>> Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a mouse-over that displays the fulltext. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think for starters we could drop the # of clicks and get >> away >>>>>> from a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> table-based model to a list-based model in the html. That >> helps >>>>>>>>>>>>>> compact things a bit and gives us more ability to use CSS for >>>>>> managing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> text display. The next step is to force wrapping, which to the >>>>>> best of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my knowledge is not really possible in CSS2. Fortunately CSS3 >>>> has >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "word-wrap:break-word" style, which does exactly what we want. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've attached a mock-up done using CSS3 using this approach. >>>> What >>>>>> do you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> think? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Email it to me directly, since the esme-dev mailing deamon >>>> usually >>>>>> kills >>>>>>>>>>>>> attachments. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or attach it to JIRA-100 item. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As a last resort, if we can't find a way to extend this to >>>>>> non-CSS3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> browsers, we could probably do some fancy JS or something to >>>>>> insert >>>>>>>>>>>>>> spaces into the text representation of the link, allowing it >> to >>>>>> wrap. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about creating dialogs but not modal dialogs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think modal dialogs and normal dialogs suffer from the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>> disadvantages in this situation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ethan >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
