The code drop from Monday. What sort of error do you get? Does it work on FF?
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]>wrote: > It works on the perf stax instance. > Which revision is deployed there? > > On 3. apr. 2010, at 08.33, Richard Hirsch wrote: > > > Have you tried it on perf stax instance? > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > >> I wanted to test in IE7, but I cannot sign up for a new account on my > >> machine (localhost:8080). > >> Is the signup page broken or is it only me? > >> > >> /Anne > >> > >> > >> On 2. apr. 2010, at 08.27, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for the UI-related work. It is great that others are doing UI > work > >> as > >>> well. > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, I'm on vacation and can't do a stax deployment until > >> Tuesday. > >>> :-< > >>> > >>> D. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> I just checked in word-wrap based fixes for both the timeline and the > >>>> popular messages/links. Word on the street is that this actually > >>>> should work in IE as well. Can someone build trunk and test, at least > >>>> on IE7? Any really long link with only normal characters in it (not -) > >>>> should trigger the issue. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Ethan > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> OK, so we need to find a way to deal with text wrapping. > >>>>> We should probably decide which browsers to support in release 1.1 > and > >>>> take it from there. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 28. mars 2010, at 19.22, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Yup, understood re. big companies still using IE6. I was just > >>>>>> wondering if any of our specific users (Siemens, at least) still > >>>>>> consider it supported internally. If not, then it might make sense > to > >>>>>> consider not supporting it if it is a lot of extra work. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On the messages front, it's just messages with long links, or other > >>>>>> long unbroken text strings that suffer the wrapping problem. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> Is the wrapping problem for messages for all messages or just those > >>>> containing long links? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The problem is that many big companies still use IE6 and won't care > >>>> about end-of-life dates. > >>>>>>> @Dick: IE6 support is still important for Siemens right? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 28. mars 2010, at 16.28, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sounds like a good approach to me, but keep in mind that we still > >> have > >>>>>>>> the wrapping problem for messages themselves. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> What is the situation with IE6 support at places that have this > >>>>>>>> deployed currently? I'm thinking since IE6 and most IE7 versions > >>>>>>>> end-of-life is July 13th, those working on the UI might not want > to > >>>>>>>> put too much effort into it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I am just afraid that text wrapping is something which will take > a > >>>> significant amount of time to get right. > >>>>>>>>> Remember we have support the following browsers: > >>>>>>>>> IE6 > >>>>>>>>> IE7 > >>>>>>>>> IE8 > >>>>>>>>> Safari > >>>>>>>>> Firefox > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I think we should put it in the backlog for now and remove these > >>>> features from the UI for the 1.1 release. > >>>>>>>>> What say you? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 27. mars 2010, at 15.42, Ethan Jewett wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Whoops! I just created ESME-186 and attached it there: > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-186 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Richard Hirsch < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Ethan Jewett < > >> [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Richard Hirsch < > >>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What I'd like to do is use JQuery tool tips to display the > >> help. > >>>> I just > >>>>>>>>>>>>> finished converting the action page and just deleted the > help. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> That sounds just about perfect! > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck. Do you have suggestion of how to display a long > >> url? > >>>> Maybe > >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a mouse-over that displays the fulltext. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think for starters we could drop the # of clicks and get > away > >>>> from a > >>>>>>>>>>>> table-based model to a list-based model in the html. That > helps > >>>>>>>>>>>> compact things a bit and gives us more ability to use CSS for > >>>> managing > >>>>>>>>>>>> text display. The next step is to force wrapping, which to the > >>>> best of > >>>>>>>>>>>> my knowledge is not really possible in CSS2. Fortunately CSS3 > >> has > >>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> "word-wrap:break-word" style, which does exactly what we want. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I've attached a mock-up done using CSS3 using this approach. > >> What > >>>> do you > >>>>>>>>>>>> think? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Email it to me directly, since the esme-dev mailing deamon > >> usually > >>>> kills > >>>>>>>>>>> attachments. > >>>>>>>>>>> Or attach it to JIRA-100 item. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> As a last resort, if we can't find a way to extend this to > >>>> non-CSS3 > >>>>>>>>>>>> browsers, we could probably do some fancy JS or something to > >>>> insert > >>>>>>>>>>>> spaces into the text representation of the link, allowing it > to > >>>> wrap. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What about creating dialogs but not modal dialogs. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think modal dialogs and normal dialogs suffer from the same > >>>>>>>>>>>> disadvantages in this situation. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
