> I think it's pretty good. However, depending on the target audience > (average Joe, geeks?) I'm not so sure about the revision history part. > The average Joe probably wouldn't really know what it was or why it's > useful. Maybe "version tracking" (or whatever MS Word uses) would be a > more self-explanatory term. > >> Does anyone object to using the phrase "Making computers suck less?" > > It's not very professional, but I would say it appeals to geeks. It > reminds me a lot of http://www.suckless.org/ > > I think the "read more" site needs some expansion on the various > concepts. At the moment it has a very brief overview of the goals, and > mostly technical stuff (frameworks).
I think our audience right now is geeks, so we're probably okay with more technical descriptions. We'll want to tweak some of the phrasings and explanations to be a bit more marketable once we get ready to release 0.5, though, since then we'll be targeting end users. J. _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
