Thanks for the comments :) >> I think it's pretty good. However, depending on the target audience >> (average Joe, geeks?) I'm not so sure about the revision history >> part. >> The average Joe probably wouldn't really know what it was or why it's >> useful. Maybe "version tracking" (or whatever MS Word uses) would >> be a >> more self-explanatory term. We will want to define "revision/version tracking". The point that is appealing, and we should communicate, is that a user will never lose his work - even old versions of documents (unless he specifically request it). >> >>> Does anyone object to using the phrase "Making computers suck less?" >> >> It's not very professional, but I would say it appeals to geeks. It >> reminds me a lot of http://www.suckless.org/ It is a bit amateur and immature - we can change at some point. I changed it to just "Making computers suck less" rather than "Etoile, or Making Computer Suck Less" for now.
>> >> I think the "read more" site needs some expansion on the various >> concepts. At the moment it has a very brief overview of the goals, >> and >> mostly technical stuff (frameworks). This has been on my to do list for a few months :) > I think our audience right now is geeks, so we're probably okay with > more technical descriptions. We'll want to tweak some of the phrasings > and explanations to be a bit more marketable once we get ready to > release 0.5, though, since then we'll be targeting end users. Yup. -Eric _______________________________________________ Etoile-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/etoile-discuss
