It seems sane to try to enforce a minimum bandwidth to maintain available, assuming the net is "up" -- say 5 or 10 kbps?? that way, most folks would realize that dialup is not so bad, and the new wireless net would not get flooded by residential users... but its PLENTY fast for a telnet/shell connexion. When you say, "get UO to support it", do you mean having them give more of their Internet^2/OC3??? I think they're very gracious as it is; there are few universities that do not REQUIRE authentication just to surf... And their wireless coverage DOES reach off-campus! What are we asking for? I'm asking for the right to share my connection at home -- UOnet's policy, afaik, does not allow that. ben
- [EUG-LUG:226] Re: Community Networks,requ... Ben Barrett
- [EUG-LUG:227] Re: Community Networks jakob
- [EUG-LUG:230] Re: Community Networks Ben Barrett
- [EUG-LUG:234] Re: Community Netw... jakob
- [EUG-LUG:240] Re: Community ... Ben Barrett
- [EUG-LUG:241] Re: Community ... Bob Miller
- [EUG-LUG:228] Re: Community Networks Michael Smith
- [EUG-LUG:231] Re: Community Networks Stephen A. Brenner
- [EUG-LUG:242] Re: Community Networks Staley W. Mims, III
- [EUG-LUG:243] Re: Community Networks Staley W. Mims, III
- [EUG-LUG:224] Re: Community Networks/bandwidth Ben Barrett
- [EUG-LUG:225] Re: Community Networks Randolph Fritz
- [EUG-LUG:236] Re: Community Networks James S. Kaplan
- [EUG-LUG:245] Re: Community Networks Michal Young
- [EUG-LUG:247] Re: Community Networks Christopher Allen
- [EUG-LUG:248] Re: Community Networks James S. Kaplan
- [EUG-LUG:262] Re: Community Networks Christopher Allen
