On Friday 01 February 2002 11:34, Linux Rocks ! wrote: > Do you mean GNU/OpenBSD ? my count on that is 8 syls (too lazy to > type all the letters for sylables).
I haven't heard of anyone proposing GNU/OpenBSD (no glibc, no bash, no..., well maybe the compiler tool chain). The writer's point was the effort involved to say Open-B-S-D was no harder than saying G-N-U-Linux). So, I think that is the point you would need to address. > Jamie > > On Thursday 31 January 2002 21:06, you wrote: > > it's > > just as many syllables as Open-B-S-D ;]), then do you really think > > they're worth your time anyway?
