On Saturday 02 February 2002 14:20, Kahli R. Burke wrote: > Mark Bigler wrote: > >On Saturday 02 February 2002 10:34, Mr O wrote: > >>...we'd all be a happy as clams to leave our > >>usage of "linux" as is. Is this agreed upon by the majority?? > > > >I'm not a member, but I did note that RMS took some exception in > > regard to the issue of EUGLUG being a true GLUG, since EUGLUG > > wasn't consistant in its use of GNU/Linux. If, then, EUGLUG isn't > > a proper GLUG, it might be best to do a slight renaming and change > > from Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group to Eugene Unix, GNU, and > > Linux User Group. > > So it's better to never mention GNU and Linux together as GNU/Linux > than to do it inconsistently, eh? > > People are just too damn picky sometimes.
RMS pointed out the inconsistency, and suggested EUGLUG wasn't a true GLUG. I was just offering a kludge fix.
