On Saturday 02 February 2002 14:49, Kahli R. Burke wrote: > Mark Bigler wrote: > >RMS pointed out the inconsistency, and suggested EUGLUG wasn't a > > true GLUG. I was just offering a kludge fix. > > It's OK, I wasn't getting angry with you, I'm just feeling like too > much energy is being put into picking at nits. I don't think there > is a GLUG certification board that we have to appease. If we want to > call ourselves a GLUG, then we can. My vote is for doing nothing.
Sounds good to me.
