On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Kahli R. Burke wrote:
> Mark Bigler wrote:
>
> >
> >RMS pointed out the inconsistency, and suggested EUGLUG wasn't a true
> >GLUG. I was just offering a kludge fix.
> >
> It's OK, I wasn't getting angry with you, I'm just feeling like too much
> energy is being put into picking at nits. I don't think there is a GLUG
> certification board that we have to appease. If we want to call
> ourselves a GLUG, then we can. My vote is for doing nothing.
>
my vote is for revamping the website (which we are planning on doing
anyway) but keeping an appropriate mixture of references to
("linux"|"GNU/Linux") depending on who writes what.
I'll volunteer to write an article on the etymology and such of the
various OS's we use. Which will include the background of this debate.
http://www.efn.org/~laprice ( Community, Cooperation, Consensus
http://www.opn.org ( Openness to serendipity, make mistakes
http://www.efn.org/~laprice/poems ( but learn from them.(carpe fructus ludi)
