Gy the way, I tried removing them with the only difference being that
packets now fail to get through when I run the interfaces independantly.
-Mike
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 15:51 -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
> Mike Cherba wrote:
>
> > 10.0.0.100 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
> > 10.0.0.100 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp1
>
>
> The oddest thing about your configuration is that you have two routes
> to the same host. How do you expect the kernel to decide which tunnel
> to use?
>
> In fact, why do you have either of those routes? Does it help
> if you remove them both?
>
--
Mike Cherba
Cavium Networks
883 Brookside Dr
Eugene, OR 97405
phone: (541) 684-3820
Cell: (541) 914-2188
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.caviumnetworks.com
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
