Hmmm, Odd. I do a lot with both external USB 2.0 HDDs and I read/write
a lot of 1-2GB CF cards. I've never experienced this sort of lockup.
Maybe I've just been lucky. I've done this with Suse, Ubuntu, & Fedora
on a variety of boxes ranging from my own company's USB 2.0
implimentation, to Nforce based MB chipsets, to whatever flavor of the
month Dell decided to put in the box I've got to work on this week. Is
there a specific pattern of activity you could follow to get the failure
to occur? I'd love to test my HW with it if so.
-Mike
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 17:36 -0800, Allen Brown wrote:
> That doesn't match my experience. Yes, UHCI should be a complete
> description. But not every manufacturer's UHCI is created equal.
>
> But I've painfully noticed the problem you mention about USB hubs.
> At least with 2.0. I don't have a working USB 2.0 hub.
>
> The problem with USB was that the storage device would randomly
> lock up after awhile. With older kernels you would be lucky to
> transfer a few gigabytes. I don't know what the mean time to fail
> on the newer kernels are.
>
> The lockups were so bad that you had to reboot. You couldn't
> remove the module and reload.
_______________________________________________
EUGLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug