On 22/09/2014 22:08, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> With the new model, the EPS will enter the contract with the venue, > so that the onsite team no longer has the financial obligations > and risk. Ah, makes sense. Still trying to understand the old vs. the new system. (: >> Anyway, I know most of the venues you listed and can already tell you that >> some are not suitable at all, either because of limited size or because of >> location. > > Could you be more specific ? Also: If you know more venues that we > could add to the list, that would be helpful. FH Technikum, for example, is way, WAY to small, and the Pyramide hotel you linked to isn't even in Vienna. I can't think of any other venue at the top of my head for a tech event of this size and don't currently have the time to go researching either, sorry. (Exams looming.) > How many people would be able to run the onsite team ? Note that for > the event itself, it's well possible to hire students to increase > the team size as necessary, but there is a minimum number of permanent > team members necessary to run the preparations for the event. I don't feel in the position to speak for PyUGAT, to be honest. As I said, I'm not sure the local Python community is involved in the proposal - or even aware of it. Best, k. _______________________________________________ EuroPython-Improve mailing list EuroPython-Improve@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve
