I think it is more of the latter but a bit of the former too David.  The S
uses quite a bit more power on accessories than most conversions, and most
drivers likely usually have climate control on.  It also has a very low drag
coefficient, so low that it has the same CdA as my little Suzuki Swift. 
That, and its 4700+ lb weight results in it's drag and rolling resistance
forces being equal at around 60-65 mph compared to around 45 mph for most
vehicles.

I consistently use less energy per mile driving around the city than on the
highway.  But I think it depends on what you mean by city driving.  I am
driving around a small city with relatively few traffic lights compared to a
city like SF or LA. Also depends on how fast you accelerate.

I've measured recouped energy from regenerative braking at 50% - 58% of the
kinetic energy of the car just prior to braking.  Considering work against
drag and rolling resistance forces, and drive train, motor/controller losses
during acceleration, it seems you only get back around around 20%-25% of the
energy used to accelerate the car.  The energy/mile used moving at ~
constant speed in city driving would have to be low enough relative to
highway driving to compensate for that energy lost during each acceleration,
and that will depend on distance driven between stop/starts.  Lots of
variables, which is why people argue endlessly about the value of regen.

--
View this message in context: 
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Re-EVLN-Upgraded-2016-Tesla-S-90D-is-the-first-300mi-483km-production-Electric-car-tp4681833p4681861.html
Sent from the Electric Vehicle Discussion List mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to