> You described a perpetuum mobile machine. No, I'm not. The energy is supplied by an outside source and is energy that would otherwise be wasted. Not "free" energy as in a "perpetuum mobile machine". But no point in bothering with details when summarily dismissing new ideas and approaches.
> That should tell you enough. Sure, your mind is already made up. > BTW, in the previous post I added "I would love to be proven wrong", so that > will tell you how much my mind is made up. Your previous reply makes it obvious. > I love seeing a reasoning that includes the laws of physics, > to avoid trying to reason about impossible energy creation. But obviously not reuse of otherwise wasted energy. We're talking about a grossly polluting mode of transportation that MAYBE gets 30% energy utilization. And here is a possible approach that might get it up to what... 31%? Only real numbers will tell but if you're content enough with the less than 30% to dismiss potential new approaches... I just saw a report on how much millennials are going to pay for cleaning up this mess we've created. Make their exorbitant cost of college pale in comparison. Almost anything seems like a viable option at this point in comparison to doing nothing. _______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/ Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
