My point is if you can capture some of that loss by adding piezos
without increasing the overall loss then, and this is the important
part, you must have the ability to reduce the loss somewhere else. If
you can do that, then I claim you come out ahead by simply doing that
and not adding piezoelectric crystals.
Peri
------ Original Message ------
From: "David Nelson" <[email protected]>
To: "Peri Hartman" <[email protected]>; "Electric Vehicle Discussion
List" <[email protected]>
Sent: 28-Aug-16 12:38:28 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Piezo-power> 10mi of freeway could charge all the
EVs inBurbank-CA(?)
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Peri Hartman via EV
<[email protected]> wrote:
I still don't get it. Even if the technology works, the energy comes
from the car.
There is already some loss from the car to the road. If some of this
loss can be captured, without increasing any losses to the car, then it
is worth considering. That is what some of us have been trying to get
across but some appear to not want to allow that possibility. The road
does flex under any load so there is some energy there to consider.
This is not some perpetual motion thing of something for nothing,
merely redirecting existing losses to something useful.
--
David D. Nelson
http://evalbum.com/1328
http://www.levforum.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20160828/db79f649/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
