Bruce and others,
In your example of water going through a Hydro power plant,
the water does lose energy, but you do not care about that usually as
just running down in the stream the water loses the same energy so
harvesting it is beneficial, because there is no purpose for the speed
of water running down a stream - in fact, often you want it to slow down
to reduce erosion.

Cars running down a freeway *do* have a purpose in maintaining their
speed.
Taking energy away from the car is detrimental and demands additional
fuel to be burned to maintain speed, at a max 30% efficiency, so this
type of energy generation would be worse than burning the fuel in most
modern power plants.

The suggestion of taking energy from the road and *not* from the car by
making the road *more* efficient somehow and making sure the piezo
elements are taking less energy than the gains of the improved road
sounds like a good approach as that would avoid removing energy from the
car.
My concern is how you can improve an almost ideal road like a concrete
freeway and by how much? I have the feeling that you are seeking
benefits from an exceedingly small amount of waste, making optimizing it
very difficult and likely not cost effective, instead of focusing on low
hanging fruit. But time will tell if this is indeed a solution
desperately looking for a problem to solve, or that there is really
merit in making piezo roads.

I know that the Dutch were criticized for building a Solar (electric)
bicycle road, but it turned out that the actually built thing is pretty
good matching what the vision of the creators was, so sometimes you have
to ignore criticism, check the Physics of what you are doing and if no
fundamental flaws are found, then simply go for it.

Anyone stating that the piezo road does not have "horizontal" force
components, only vertical and therefor it will have no impact on the
speed of the car, does not understand the Physics involved. I have tried
to explain it in a simple example, I cannot comprehend it for you.

Kind Regards,

Cor van de Water 
Chief Scientist 
Proxim Wireless 
  
office +1 408 383 7626                    Skype: cor_van_de_water 
XoIP   +31 87 784 1130                    private: cvandewater.info 

http://www.proxim.com

This email message (including any attachments) contains confidential and
proprietary information of Proxim Wireless Corporation.  If you received
this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender.  Any
unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, or copying of any part of
this message is prohibited.


-----Original Message-----
From: EV [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of via EV
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 10:29 AM
To: Peri Hartman; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Piezo-power> 10mi of freeway could charge all the
EVsinBurbank-CA(?)

> My point is if you can capture some of that loss by adding piezos
without increasing the overall loss then, and this is the important
part, you must have the ability to reduce the loss somewhere else. If
you can do that, then I claim you come out ahead by simply doing that
and not adding piezoelectric crystals. 

But that is the fallacy to the opposition to this... It is simply
deriving energy from the transfer of weight that naturally occurs in
going from point A to point B. The only way to reduce that energy is to
reduce the weight. While that might be possible, it has absolutely
nothing do do with harnessing the energy. It no different that putting a
hydroelectric power source in a flowing body of water. Gaining energy
from a source where it was previously water. But, according to what has
been posted, that's impossible since no measurable heat is generated
from flowing water. 

The key to this is that it is harnessing the energy from the (previously
wasted) energy t in the change of the vertical force vector. Some are
incorrectly assuming that this HAS to somehow negatively impact the
energy exchange in the horizontal force vector. The two forces are
perpendicular to each other and are completely independent. Stretches in
proposed approaches are incorrectly tying these together to
unnecessarily make them dependent on each other. 
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Read EVAngel's EV News at http://evdl.org/evln/
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to