I am on the same page as you.
On Thursday, February 3, 2022, 05:14:21 PM CST, John Lussmyer via EV
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu Feb 03 08:08:13 PST 2022 [email protected] said:
>Results: Stop sign violations accounted for about 70% of all crashes.
>Typically these crashes were angular collisions. Among crashes not involving
>stop violations, rear-end crashes were most common, accounting for about 12%
>of all crashes. Stop sign violation crashes were classified into several
>subtypes - driver stopped, driver did not stop, snow/wet/ice, and
>other/unknown. In about two-thirds of stop sign violation crashes, drivers
>said they had first come to a stop. In these cases, inability or failure to
>see approaching traffic often was cited as the cause of the crash. Drivers
>younger than 18 as well as drivers 65 and older were disproportionately found
>to be at fault in crashes at stop signs.
>
>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14733981/
So, you admit that those accidents are generally due to people not paying
attention. Which is not something that an AI would do.
So, it's likely that letting an AI do a rolling stop would save wear on the
vehicle, save energy, and not increase the number of accidents.
--
Try my Sensible Email package! https://sourceforge.net/projects/sensibleemail/
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20220204/127ac087/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
