At 9/13/01, you wrote:
>Yes, words like "alternation" and "succession" definitely imply that time
>is involved. But you are saying that this is a timeless
>construct (like Platonia of the multiverse) ?
Time as I understand the usual usage involves the concepts of fixed cycles
measured by a clock and potentially reconstructible histories - example:
why does time have an arrow if each "law" of physics is symmetric to time
reversal [ The behavior of some subatomic "particles" aside.]
I do not see how these concepts are compatible with the postulate.
I have to admit that I miss the reference to "Platonia".