Dear Bruno: Thank you for your comments.
Yes I know there are more key words to include, and some to remove as well, etc. etc.. Any comments are welcome. I hope to have the next reasonable draft improvement available by Monday. It will be a slow process. To avoid clutter in the archive, for now I will post all draft iterations to: http://www.connix.com/~hjr/everythinglistFAQ.html I am thinking of adding a section in which model threads would be contrasted to other FAQ's such as the Everett one where such distinctions have not been covered in other sections of the one I am putting together. Again any comments and help are welcome and most likely necessary. Hal At 3/1/01, you wrote: >Hello Hal Ruhl > >About your list of questions you are missing some important >keywords, it seems to me. > >You miss Russell Standish's "occam", George Levy's "plenitude", >Jacques Mallah's "implementation", Higgo's "buddha", my own >"phi/psy reversal", etc. > >The introductory dialog by Wei Dai and Hal Finney makes the >problem clear (a dissatisfaction with Schmidhuber quick >dissolution of "philosophical" problems in his TOE), >Ontological consistency in Tegmark sort of TOE, etc. > >Just some remarks. > >Bruno >
