James, you misunderstood my incorrect sentence: You wrote: "> Yes, but if I want to talk like a flatlander, I can talk to my girlfriend, not use this list<" upon my note (Friday, 11 August, 2000: > >"Fine. *We* are still IN the framework of thinking in human terms, > > circumstances, logic, even in QS. Remember Flatland"? > >") What I meant is really a general "we", the list, standing for "You" and the ET discussion partners on the list. Not "me". All the circumstances considered are in a Flatlandish mood of thinking, human logic, even if one wants to be "free". So, you may talk to your girlfriend, but on this list I see "human" implications posited upon ET discussions. That is what I wanted to point out. John Mikes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "http://pages.prodigy.net/jamikes";
----- Original Message ----- From: "Higgo James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'John Mikes'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 4:24 AM Subject: RE: Extra Terrestrials > Yes, but if I want to talk like a flatlander, I can talk to my girlfriend, not use this list >
