> I just want to be more explicit in my characterization of the guardian
> angels, the fatalisitic slobs and the narcissistic gods.


I don't know how you justify dividing the ETs into such neat
categories, based on the MWI and the feasability of QS.  That is
not clear to me at all from your posts so far.  Why couldn't an
ET who understands MWI and QS (and, assuming that QS *is* 
feasable) still behave like one of the ones that SETI is 
searching for?  I.e. broadcast their presence and interact with
other civilizations?

Chris Maloney

"Let us recommend ourselves to Providence."
-- Candide (Voltaire)

Reply via email to