----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: Is consciousness real?
> James Higgo writes:
> > Consciousness - a flow of related thoughts in time - does not exist, any
> > more than time itself exists. All that exists of 'you' is this very
> > thought.
> > This simple view solves all known paradoxes of consciousness, fits with
> > we know of the world, and is, incidentally, in concord with Buddhist
> > philosophy. You can even be happy if you believe it; believing it forces
> > to live in the present.
> This solves all the problems, does it? What about the question of
> whether something, say an animal or a fetus, is conscious or not?
> Should I treat conscious and unconscious entities the same?
> And if consciousness doesn't exist, does that mean suffering doesn't
> exist either? Should we not care about slavery, torture and other
> institutions that cause human suffering?
> I think you have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.
Go back and re-read -EXACTLY- what James is saying.
>All that exists of 'you' is this very present thought.
Re-read it, look at it, contemplate it, meditate on it, think upon it, dwell
on it .......then tell me if this statement is true or false.
BTW ---IF you see the validity of this statement, you will move into an
entirely different "universe" then you will ever have experienced in your