> John M. wrote
> > I believe if we are up to identifying concepts with
> > common sense content as well, we should not restrict
> > ourselves into the model-distinctions of (any) physics
> > but generalize the meanings beyond such restrictions.
I agree: that is, so long as we can smoothly extend the
concepts from daily life without conflict with other areas
> > To Russell's 4 coordinates of (any?) event: how come
> > the occurrence (event!) of a 'good idea' in my mind -
> > (mind: not a thing, not a place, not time-restricted)
> > should have t,x,y,z coordinates?
> I would say that the event occurs in your brain (the neural correlate
> of whatever is going on in your mind). Whatever is going on in your
> mind is something else - an "observation" perhaps.
Interesting note about "mind": there is no German language
equivalent for it. Another reason to be *very* careful when
employing it. <Sarcastic comment about the possibility of
Teutonic zombies elided.>
In a very deep (but non-mathematical) book, "What is Thought?"
by Eric Baum, the author decides to use "mind" as the name of
the program the brain runs, and it seems to work out well.