Give me your FAX number and I will fax you the photo. -----Original Message----- From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:45 PM To: John Ross; 'Russell Standish' Cc: 'Hal Ruhl'; [email protected] Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea
I'm sure you saw something else :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Russell Standish'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "'Hal Ruhl'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 01:40 AM Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea > I say a neutrino does not have a rest mass. It is a photon, like a > very high energy gamma ray photon. I have seen photos of a neutrino > collision in a neutrino trap. From the look of all the resulting > ionization tracks, it must have had a lot more energy than 40 ev. I > say the energy of neutrinos is in the range of 300 mev! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Russell Standish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:00 PM > To: John Ross > Cc: 'Hal Ruhl'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea > > > According to special relativity, anything with a positive rest mass > travels slower than the speed of light. Neutrinos have been measured > with a positive rest mass, of around 40ev for the electron neutrino > IIRC, and higher values for the muon and tauon neutrinos. > > I have never heard of either tardyon or luxon before either, but have > heard of tachyon, or faster than light particle. Clearly tardyon is > therefore slower than light, and luxon is at light speed. > > Luxons therefore have zero rest mass, and tachyons have imaginary (ie > proportional to sqrt(-1)) rest mass. > > Cheers > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:06:55PM -0700, John Ross wrote: > > Where is the proof that a neutrino is not a photon. I believe > > people > > are only guessing that a neutrino is a tardyon, whatever in the hell a > > > tardyon is. Tardyons are not in my dictionary. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hal Ruhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:50 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea > > > > > > As I understand it a photon is a luxon as is a gluon and a neutrino > > is a tardyon. > > > > Hal Ruhl > > > > > > At 04:49 PM 10/10/2005, you wrote: > > >I think the beta decay model is wrong where it predicts neutrinos > > >are basically different from photons. I understand neutrinos > > >travel at > the > > > > >speed of light. Only photons travel at the speed of light. > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 4:30 PM > > >To: John Ross; [email protected] > > >Subject: Re: Neutrino shield idea > > > > > > > > >This means that beta decay proves your model wrong. > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "John Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "'Stephen Paul King'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > ><[email protected]> > > >Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:35 AM > > >Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the paper relating to detection of "low energy" > > > > neutrinos. However, according to my model, neutrinos are very, > very > > > > high energy photons (off everybody's chart, except mine). > > > > > > > > Therefore, if my model is correct, then low energy neutrinos > > > > would merely be the photons we are familiar with and would be > > > > very easy > to > > > > > > detect. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Stephen Paul King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:54 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Neutrino shield idea > > > > > > > > > > > > Howdy! > > > > > > > > I friend of mine has worked on a related idea that might > > > > help this > > > > > > > inverstigation. Please see: > > > > > > > > http://davidwoolsey.com/physics/ideas/neutrinoscope/index.html > > > > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > > > > Stephen > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "John Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 11:57 AM > > > > Subject: RE: ROSS MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE - The Simplest Yet > > > > Theory > > > > of > > > > > > Everything > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. But building a neutrino shield would be difficult. > > > > > > -- > *PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which > is of type "application/pgp-signature". Don't worry, it is not a virus. > It is an electronic signature, that may be used to verify this email > came from me if you have PGP or GPG installed. Otherwise, you may safely > ignore this attachment. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > ---- > A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 8308 3119 (mobile) > Mathematics 0425 253119 (") > UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Australia > http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks > International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > ---- >
