Le 01-juil.-06, à 19:54, Brent Meeker a écrit :

> Sure it is.  Just because something cannot be directly experienced 
> doesn't rule it out of a
> scienctific model: quarks can't be observed, but their effects can.

OK, but we were discussing about theories. general relativity, as a 
theory does not assume the existence of readers of "relativity 
journal". The quantum theory *with collapse* is already less clear on 
that ...

> So I believe in other people's
> first person experience because that is a good way to predict their 
> behavoir.

Except the same theory would predict the behavior of zombie. We are 
arguing on a fundamental level. All what I argue for is that once you 
*assume* comp, then there is no aristotelian primary matter, and 
eventually physics is branch of number's bio/psych/theo/logy.

>  I consult a model in
> which I use my first person experience to perdict how they will behave 
> - this is called emphathizing
> - and I find it works pretty well.

You are lucky but then I don't know any other ways. But again, in those 
threads we are not just interested in prediction (even if they are the 
ultimate test) but in understanding.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to