Le 21-juil.-06, à 17:52, Brent Meeker a écrit :
> If there is anything left over. I don't think it is sufficiently > appreciated that this > "unknowability" is an assumption. No bigger than the "assumption" that "other" minds exists (a key assumption in comp if only through the trust to the doctor). And then it is a theorem that for any correct machine there are true propositions about them that the machine cannot prove. Modeling (at first) knowledge by [true justified opinion] (Theaetetus) and modeling (at first) the [justified opinion] by the machine provability ability (in the sense of Godel), gives a theory justifying that for each correct machine there exist true unknowable propositions. More can be said: if you have two machines M1 and M2 having similar complexity there will be truth about M1 which are unknowable by M2 and vice versa. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
