On 9/29/2025 10:39 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Saturday, September 6, 2025 at 5:56:36 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:

    No. You're over complicating the problem.  It's as simple as the
    fact that two different thru spacetime are different lengths. 
    Because the spatial coordinate distance, X, appears with a minus
    sign relative to the coordinate time, T, the proper time, S (which
    is what a clock measures).  So the rocket, which takes the longer
    spatial path, experiences less proper time lapse.


*Aren't you assuming that the integrated S over both paths is the same? This is the issue I previously flagged. How do we know that both paths when integrated, have identical lengths, S? AG *
Certainly not. *The whole point is that they have different length!*  The proper time S is what a clock (or age) measures.

Brent





    This result has nothing to do with accelerations experience by the
    traveler.  This a common specious  "explanation" trying to connect
    it to general relativity.  This is most easily seen by the triplet
    version of the paradox.  In this version the one triplet stays
    home, one travelers away from Earth, and one who has been far away
    returns to Earth.  When the outbound triplet passes the inbound
    triplet he hands off the time to the inbound one, so together they
    measure the same path as the turnaround twin.



    Notice that I have also avoided any acceleration at the beginning
    and end, so no triplet ever accelerates.

    Brent



    On 9/6/2025 8:01 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:
    On Saturday, September 6, 2025 at 5:39:18 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

        On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 1:10 AM Alan Grayson
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            /> If you recall, you recently posted some links to the
            TP and accused me of not reading them. Well, I certainly
            intended to read them and I explained why. But then I got
            involved in other  discussions here and put that
            temporarily aside. But now those links are, from my pov,
            lost in a myriad of discussion threads. So, please be so
            kind as to post them again here. TY, AG/


        *Start with this video:*


        *I Never Understood How To Intuitively Solve The Twin's
        Paradox ... Until Now!*
        <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V00tAfcHCI>

        *John K Clark    See what's on my new list at Extropolis
        <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*


    I've encountered that fellow before. He speaks too fast, way too
    fast. It seems to me that GR solves the problem, and without
    frame jumping. Just imagine several changes in velocity, each
    spread out, so not instantaneous. During those changes, time for
    the traveler slows compared to rest frame on Earth, so when he
    returns to meet his twin, he is younger. Do you see anything
    wrong with this analysis? AG

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/171eadbf-9e31-455e-9002-7513258f9a74n%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/171eadbf-9e31-455e-9002-7513258f9a74n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2efcbfa8-fbf8-4492-b4ad-2ed7a52a0a98%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to