Correct me if I'm mistaken, but as far as I know the wf has never been observed; only the observations of the system it represents. This being the case, in a large number of trials. Born's rulle will be satisfied regardless of which interpretation an observer affirms; either the MWI with no collapse of the wf, or Copenhagen with collapse of the wf. That is, since we can only observe the statistical results of an experiment from a this-world perspective, and we see that Born's rule is satisfied, so I don't see how it can be argued that the rule fails to be satisfied if the MWI is assumed. I think the same can be said about the other worlds assumed by the MWI, namely, that IF we could measure their results, the rule would likewise be satisfied.AG
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3c9efd90-92ec-43b3-bb88-1cbf1bc85475n%40googlegroups.com.
