On 9/29/2025 3:38 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:


On Monday, September 29, 2025 at 4:21:29 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker wrote:



    On 9/29/2025 10:39 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:


    On Saturday, September 6, 2025 at 5:56:36 PM UTC-6 Brent Meeker
    wrote:

        No. You're over complicating the problem.  It's as simple as
        the fact that two different thru spacetime are different
        lengths.  Because the spatial coordinate distance, X, appears
        with a minus sign relative to the coordinate time, T, the
        proper time, S (which is what a clock measures).  So the
        rocket, which takes the longer spatial path, experiences less
        proper time lapse.


    *Aren't you assuming that the integrated S over both paths is the
    same? This is the issue I previously flagged. How do we know that
    both paths when integrated, have identical lengths, S? AG *
    Certainly not. *The whole point is that they have different
    length!*  The proper time S is what a clock (or age) measures.

    Brent


*If they have different S lengths, how can you conclude the proper time on stationary twin's clock records more time than the traveling twin's clock? Only if the S lengths are identical (which I didn't believe when I posted my question) can you reach that conclusion. AG *
If they have different proper times, how can I conclude one is more than the other??  I can only conclude that if they are identical?? Have you lost your ability to read English??

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/418fa70c-29ab-44aa-ba61-39f0a393b1a7%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to