Colin Geoffrey Hales wrote:
>>the fact that
>>intelligent behaviour is third person observable but consciousness is
>>Stathis Papaioannou
> OK. Let me get this straight. Scientist A stares at something, say X, 
> with consciousness. A sees X. Scientist A posits evidence of X from a
> third person viewpoint. Scientist A confers with Scientist B. Scientist B
> then goes and stares at X and agrees. Both of these people use
> consciousness to come to this conclusion.
> Explicit Conclusion : "Yep, theres an X!"
> Yet there's no evidence of consciousness?.... that which literally enabled
> the entire process? There is an assumption at work....
> and
> Are NOT identities.
> When you 'stare' at anything at all you have evidence of consciousness.

A SIDWINDER missile 'stares' at the exhaust of a jet aircraft. Does that make 

Brent Meeker

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to