Stathis Papaioannou wrote: > Peter Jones writes: > > >> Stathis Papaioannou wrote: >> >> >>> If every computation is implemented everywhere anyway, this is equivalent to >>> the situation where every computation exists as a platonic object, or every >>> computation exists implemented on some computer or brain in a material >>> multiverse. >> >> But if implementing a particular computation depends on an observer, or a >> dicitonary, or somesuch, it is not the case that everything implements every >> computation unless it can be shown that evey dictionary somehow exists as >> well. > > > The computation provides its own observer if it is conscious, by definition.
I'm always suspicious of things that are true "by definition". How exactly does an observer provide meaning or whatever it is that makes a computation? And how does consciousness fulfill this function. I, in my conscious thoughts, certainly don't "observe" the computation that my brain performs. In fact my thoughts seem to spring from nowhere more or less spontaneously in coherent trains or as prompted by perceptions. Brent Meeker --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
