So now we have to find some way sto tackle the problem of finding the
right level of abstraction to pursue ...
Le 03-févr.-07, à 10:05, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
> Bruno Marchal writes:
> > What is correct, and has been singled out by Stathis, is that comp
> > eludes the "material implementation" problem, given that we take all
> > abstract possible relationship between those objects, and they are
> > well defined as purely number theoretical relations. Note that this
> > something I have tried to explain to Jacques Mallah sometimes ago,
> > without much success. This does not make much sense in ASSA
> > but, like George Levy I think, I don't believe in absolute
> > of being me, or of living my current "observer moment". Such a
> > probability can be given the value one (said George) but it is close
> > saying that the universe is here, which tells us nothing, really. It
> > like answering "who are you?" by I am me".
> I'm satisfied with this summary. The physical implementation problem
> is not
> a problem when considering abstract machines.
> Stathis Papaioannou
> Live Search: Better results, fast Try it now!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at