So now we have to find some way sto tackle the problem of finding the 
right level of abstraction to pursue ...


Le 03-févr.-07, à 10:05, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :

>  Bruno Marchal writes:
> > What is correct, and has been singled out by Stathis, is that comp
> > eludes the "material implementation" problem, given that we take all
> > abstract possible relationship between those objects, and they are 
> all
> > well defined as purely number theoretical relations. Note that this 
> is
> > something I have tried to explain to Jacques Mallah sometimes ago, 
> but
> > without much success. This does not make much sense in ASSA 
> approaches,
> > but, like George Levy I think, I don't believe in absolute 
> probability
> > of being me, or of living my current "observer moment". Such a
> > probability can be given the value one (said George) but it is close 
> of
> > saying that the universe is here, which tells us nothing, really. It 
> is
> > like answering "who are you?" by I am me".
> I'm satisfied with this summary. The physical implementation problem 
> is not
> a problem when considering abstract machines.
> Stathis Papaioannou
> Live Search: Better results, fast Try it now!
>  >

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to