So now we have to find some way sto tackle the problem of finding the right level of abstraction to pursue ...
Bruno Le 03-févr.-07, à 10:05, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit : > Bruno Marchal writes: > > > What is correct, and has been singled out by Stathis, is that comp > > eludes the "material implementation" problem, given that we take all > > abstract possible relationship between those objects, and they are > all > > well defined as purely number theoretical relations. Note that this > is > > something I have tried to explain to Jacques Mallah sometimes ago, > but > > without much success. This does not make much sense in ASSA > approaches, > > but, like George Levy I think, I don't believe in absolute > probability > > of being me, or of living my current "observer moment". Such a > > probability can be given the value one (said George) but it is close > of > > saying that the universe is here, which tells us nothing, really. It > is > > like answering "who are you?" by I am me". > > I'm satisfied with this summary. The physical implementation problem > is not > a problem when considering abstract machines. > > Stathis Papaioannou > > Live Search: Better results, fast Try it now! > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---