This is what brought me to the idea that while
all objects have "simultaneous" existence they
also can have degrees of hyper existence. Hyper
existence is like a tag that indicates states
that "are", those that are "becoming", and those
that have recently "been" [so to speak].
At 04:26 PM 2/15/2007, you wrote:
>you seem to have mastered the problem I got
>stuck with in the 'timelessness' speculation
>(Any succession of states is allowed. )
> I could not handle successions in reverse, if
> time (as an indicator of succession) is cut out.
>I did not want to resort to an atemporal system
>where ALL steps of processes (what is a process???) live side by side together.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Hal Ruhl
>Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:37 PM
>Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds
>I was using some of the main components of my
>model to indicate that it allows white rabbits of
>all degree. Any succession of states is
>allowed. If the presence of SAS in certain
>successions requires a certain family of white
>rabbit distributions then these distributions are present.
>At 04:23 AM 2/9/2007, you wrote:
> >Le 07-févr.-07, à 02:45, Hal Ruhl a écrit :
> > > Given an uncountably infinite number of objects generated from a
> > > countably infinite list of properties and an uncountably infinite
> > > number of UD's in the metaphor I can not see an issue with this re my
> > > model. As I said above "Our World" can be as precisely as random as
> > > it needs to be.
> >I don't understand.
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.36/681
>- Release Date: 2/11/2007 6:50 PM
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at