Hal:
you seem to have mastered the problem I got stuck with in the 'timelessness' 
speculation
(Any succession of states is allowed. )
 I could not handle successions in reverse, if time (as an indicator of 
succession) is cut out. 
I did not want to resort to an atemporal system where ALL steps of processes 
(what is a process???) live side by side together.

John M
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Hal Ruhl 
  To: everything-list@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:37 PM
  Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds



  Hi Bruno:

  I was using some of the main components of my 
  model to indicate that it allows white rabbits of 
  all degree.  Any succession of states is 
  allowed.  If the presence of SAS in certain 
  successions requires a certain family of white 
  rabbit distributions then these distributions are present.

  Hal Ruhl

  At 04:23 AM 2/9/2007, you wrote:


  >Le 07-févr.-07, à 02:45, Hal Ruhl a écrit :
  >
  > >  Given an uncountably infinite number of objects generated from a
  > > countably infinite list of properties and an uncountably infinite
  > > number of UD's in the metaphor I can not see an issue with this re my
  > > model.  As I said above "Our World" can be as precisely as random as
  > > it needs to be.
  >
  >
  >I don't understand.
  >
  >Bruno
  >
  >
  >
  >http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
  >
  >
  >

  


  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.36/681 - Release Date: 2/11/2007 
6:50 PM


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to