Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On 07/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> Evolution doesn't care about the survival of individual organisms
> directly, the actual goal of evolution is only to maximize
> reproductive fitness.
> If you want to eat a peice of chocolate cake, evolution explains why
> you like the taste, but your goals are not evolutions goals. You
> (Stathis) want to the cake because it tastes nice - *your* goal is to
> experience the nice taste. Evolution's goal (maximize reproductive
> fitness) is quite different. Our (human) goals are not evolution's
> That's right, but we can see through evolution's tricks with the
> chocolate cake and perhaps agree that it would be best not to eat it.
> This involves reasoning about subgoals in view of the top level goal,
> something that probably only humans among the animals are capable of
> doing. However, the top level goal is not something that we generally
> want to change, no matter how insightful and intelligent we are. And I
> do think that this top level goal must have been programmed into us
> directly as fear of death, because it does not arise logically from the
> desire to avoid painful and anxiety-provoking situations, which is how
> fear of death is indirectly coded in animals.
> Stathis Papaioannou
The top level goal implied by evolution would be to have as many children as
you can raise through puberty. Avoiding death should only be a subgoal.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at