On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 08:44:54PM -0000, David Nyman wrote: > There is no analogy between the two cases, because > Russell seeks to pull the entire 1-person rabbit, complete with 'way > of being', out of a hat that contains only 3-person formalisations. > This is magic with a vengeance.
You assume way too much about my motives here. I have only been trying to bash some meaning out of the all too flaccid prose that's being flung about at the moment. I will often employ counterexamples simply to illustrate points of poor terminology, or sloppy thinking. Its a useful exercise, not a personal attack on beliefs. BTW - I'm with you Brent. Brent is also doing exactly this, sometimes satirically. Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Mathematics UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
