Le 22-août-07, à 07:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > > > On Aug 22, 4:41 pm, Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's a pity. I thought it might be something comprehensible, rather >> than just plain mysterious. >> >> Cheers >> > > The ida of property dualism is very simple: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_dualism > > It just means that the same underlying reality can manifest itself as > multiple properties. Except that "property dualism" is used by weak materialist (believing in primitive matter or in physicalism). Of course I pretend that the underlying reality needed when comp is assumed is given by numbers (natural numbers + their additive and multiplicative properties). Matter emerges from the possible comp gluing of numbers' dreams (= computations as seen from a first person perspective). Just taking a look on Google on "property dualism": here I found quickly someone asserting that property dualism can indeed be seen as a form of emergentism like Russell said: http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/courses/mind/notes/supervenience.html But again, I prefer not to use this expression (property dualism) because we are living in a world where most rational monist can conceive only monism as a materialism. I know it is a bit shocking, but I argue that comp is incompatible with even very weak form of materialism. Realities (personal and first person plural) are given by the inside cohering video games implicit in the "block arithmetical 3-view"). They are unavoidable from the first person pov. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
