--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/2/11 Jack Mallah <jackmal...@yahoo.com>
> > And if your measure were to drop off dramatically overnight, it is 
> > equivalent to saying that many _more people_ woke up in your bed today as 
> > compared to the number of people who will wake up in your bed tommorrow.
> >
> > Which is equivalent to saying that, for all practical purposes, you will 
> > probably die overnight.  And that is the point.
> >
> I don't think so, the point is that there is still someone who will wake up 
> in the bed tomorrow... as long as the measure is not null this is true, and 
> that's what count for the argument to be valid.

There are some people who will, but relatively few.  That is what counts for QS 
to be invalid.

> So what you are saying is that at some point the measure fall to be strictly 
> null... and that needs an argument from your part.

No, I never suggested it is zero.  It doesn't have to be.

> Also you did not answer the question about the realness feeling of observer 
> B... he has twice less measure according to you, does it feel less 
> alive/real/conscious ?

I answered that previously.  Measure affects the commonness of an observation, 
not what it feels like.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to