Bruno Marchal wrote:
> ...
> (*) Once and for all, when I say I am a modal realist, I really mean  
> this "I have an argument showing that the comp theory imposes modal  
> realism".  I am really not defending any theory. I am just showing  
> that the comp theory leads to precise and verifiable/refutable facts.  
> I am a logician: all what I show to people is that IF you believe this  
> THEN you have to believe that. It is part of my personal religion that  
> my personal religion is personal and private (and evolvable).

I understand that.  And just so I'm not misunderstood, when I refer to 
"your theory" I don't mean to imply that it is something you believe. I 
just mean the theory that you have elucidated.  I understand that you 
could put forth several different theories and believe any of them.

"Nobody believes a theory except the guy who thought of it.  Everybody 
believes an experiment except the guy who did it."
             --- Leon Lederman

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to