On Jul 5, 9:44 pm, thermo thermo <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > I am not very much into string theory but i liked the paper, it was > pretty much self-contained for me, a computer-scientist, . > > On the other side, It seems that the main conclusions are extracted > from the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem and not from Godel Incompleteness > theorem. So the abstract is a little sleight of hand and, possibly, > misleading.
And even then, I don't think he uses the Löwenheim–Skolem properly. I don't think the cardinality of a model is the same as the cardinalities which the model employs. Tom > > Regards, > > José. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%B6wenheim%E2%80%93Skolem_theorem > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:30 AM, ronaldheld<[email protected]> wrote: > > >http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0907/0907.0216v1.pdf > > comments?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
