On Jul 5, 9:44 pm, thermo thermo <therm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am not very much into string theory but i liked the paper, it was
> pretty much self-contained for me, a computer-scientist, .
>
> On the other side, It seems that the main conclusions are extracted
> from the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem and not from Godel Incompleteness
> theorem. So the abstract is a little sleight of hand and, possibly,
> misleading.

And even then, I don't think he uses the Löwenheim–Skolem properly.  I
don't think the cardinality of a model is the same as the
cardinalities which the model employs.

Tom

>
> Regards,
>
> José.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%B6wenheim%E2%80%93Skolem_theorem
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:30 AM, ronaldheld<ronaldh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0907/0907.0216v1.pdf
> > comments?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to