John Mikes wrote:
> Brian,
> I started to read the text and found the 1st sentence:
> 
> /"In modern cosmology, a /
> 
> /multiverse is defined to be a collection of possible physical universes"/
> 
> that pissed me off: 'possible' in our today's sense includes many 
> 'impossibilities' in the sense of a mindset of 1000 years ago and I 
> assume does NOT include lots of 'possibles' in the scientific(?) mindset 
> 1000 years hence.
> 
> I find the position a 'present-day restricted' reductionist approach 
> adjusted into our 2009(or earlier?) cognitive inventory of physics.  
> 
> In rigorous science I could not do better, but is it a position you 
> would really deem  a "a very interesting read"?
> 
> JohnM

I agree with JM.  Whenever I read the word "possible" I feel the intellectual 
ground shift and I look for a hand hold in case it turns to quicksand.

Brent

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to