John Mikes wrote:
> Brian,
> I started to read the text and found the 1st sentence:
> /"In modern cosmology, a /
> /multiverse is defined to be a collection of possible physical universes"/
> that pissed me off: 'possible' in our today's sense includes many 
> 'impossibilities' in the sense of a mindset of 1000 years ago and I 
> assume does NOT include lots of 'possibles' in the scientific(?) mindset 
> 1000 years hence.
> I find the position a 'present-day restricted' reductionist approach 
> adjusted into our 2009(or earlier?) cognitive inventory of physics.  
> In rigorous science I could not do better, but is it a position you 
> would really deem  a "a very interesting read"?
> JohnM

I agree with JM.  Whenever I read the word "possible" I feel the intellectual 
ground shift and I look for a hand hold in case it turns to quicksand.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to