John Mikes wrote: > Brian, > I started to read the text and found the 1st sentence: > > /"In modern cosmology, a / > > /multiverse is defined to be a collection of possible physical universes"/ > > that pissed me off: 'possible' in our today's sense includes many > 'impossibilities' in the sense of a mindset of 1000 years ago and I > assume does NOT include lots of 'possibles' in the scientific(?) mindset > 1000 years hence. > > I find the position a 'present-day restricted' reductionist approach > adjusted into our 2009(or earlier?) cognitive inventory of physics. > > In rigorous science I could not do better, but is it a position you > would really deem a "a very interesting read"? > > JohnM
I agree with JM. Whenever I read the word "possible" I feel the intellectual ground shift and I look for a hand hold in case it turns to quicksand. Brent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
