Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2009, at 09:11, Rex Allen wrote:
>>>> Uncaused things can't be explained. They just are.
>>>> So what causes the complexity and structure of the things that I am
>>>> conscious of? Nothing. That's just the way my experience is.
>>> ? I can't accept this, because I am interested in the how and why of
>>> complexity of things and happenings.
>> So you can look for patterns in what you observe, and interesting ways
>> to represent what you have observed in the past.
> Not just that. I look for understanding. I criticize enough the
> scientists who confuse description and prediction with explanation.
I disagree that this a confusion. A description of something you don't
terms of something you do understand is one form of explanation. The ability
is an excellent measure of understanding. I think the only confusion comes
conflating different kinds of explanation or thoughtlessly switching from one
I would say that your explanation of the world is a descriptive one and basing
arithmetic is appealing because we understand arithmetic. And I think you
agree that if
it makes false predictions it fails as an explanation.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at