On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> Rex Allen wrote: >> >> Note that I am not arguing that this particular belief is an >> impossible belief. What I'm arguing is that evolution doesn't help >> you one way or the other in deciding...because evolution is just a >> mental tool, a way of thinking by analogy. Lacking any sort of causal >> mechanism, it doesn't explain the way things are. It's just a story >> that helps us think about the way things are. Right? > > Why do you say evolution lacks a causal mechanism? Natural selection causes > somethings not to occur - like animals that eat their children.
What would the causal mechanism for natural selection be? A "selection field"? "Selection particles"? Spooky "selection at a distance"??? Even if you could find some way to frame it in terms of one of those, would you then say that the "selection field" was something that actually existed, or would you believe it more likely to just be a calculational device? Though, some animals do eat their children under some circumstances. Why? Well, according to physicialism, because of the initial conditions of the universe plus the causal laws that govern it's state changes over time. Evolution would seem to be more of a metaphorical framework for thinking about possibilities, rather than an actual scientific explanation for anything. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.