On Nov 27, 8:53 pm, Rex Allen <rexallen31...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:44 AM, 1Z <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 26, 6:31 am, Rex Allen <rexallen31...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Any defense of "free will" must allow for ultimate responsibility for 
> >> actions.
> > Mine does
> Random events don't qualify as free will.

So you say. I think that;s arbitrary. I think
the real object is to irrational decision, and
I have argued that rationality is compatible with FW

I could "prove" you don;t exist by redefining
"Rex Allen" to mean "square circle". So what?
Philosophical questions always boil down
to definitiions, and particularly, to how reaosnable
they are.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to