On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> Physical laws aren't "out there".  They are models we invent.  So of course
> we like to invent algorithmic ones because they are more usable.  People
> used to invent non-algorithmic ones, like "Zeus does that when he's angry."
> but they were hard to apply.  QM is entirely algorithmic since it includes
> inherent randomness.  However this is probably not important for the
> function of brains.

Did you mean to say QM is *not* entirely algorithmic? If randomness is
important in the brain it is then a further step to show that true
randomness, rather than pseudorandomness, is necessary.


-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to